The organizers of the recent iEvoBio meeting have asked for a summary of the Birds-of-a-Feather session. I didn’t take notes, but here is a start:
About 10 people participated in the BoF that merged the three sign-up topics “open notebook science”, “data sharing and reuse”, and “data citations and a culture of credit.”
We had an energetic and wide-ranging discussion that included participation from people with diverse backgrounds, perspectives, and opinions. A few of the topics included:
- the variants of open notebook science and how they are supported (or undersupported, in some cases) by Open Wet Ware
- the need to publish minimal data slices to prevent scooping, particularly for some datatypes, and how it can lead to misinterpretation of the data by others
- whether data-producing authors should be contacted as collaborators for reuse
- the fact that credit is essential, yet so is remembering that our jobs are fundamentally to contribute to scientific progress
- support for dynamic CV that included up-to-date reuse metrics for articles, data, and nontraditional outputs.
If you were there, do you have things to add? Respond in the comments or on twitter with #ievobioBof .
I learned a lot from the perspectives of others in the discussion: looking forward to more conversations at future meetings.
Sounds like an interesting session – I would add these points as important to ONS:
1) Generating self-contained archives periodically that can be cited when appropriate
2) Abstracting the information in the notebook to a form that can be read by machines
3) Giving multiple entry points to the information contained in the notebooks (Google Scholar, Google, institutional repositories, Nature Precedings etc.)
Comment by Jean-Claude Bradley — July 13, 2010 @ 7:58 am
Heather!
There was also some talk about the efficacy of allowing comments/edits to web-published scientific papers (i.e. things in PLoSONE), but the seeming lack of participation. The idea of keeping a document ‘live’ after publishing is enticing, but we don’t seem to have the infrastructure for it yet…
Andrea
Comment by andrea — July 15, 2010 @ 2:14 pm