Research Remix

July 14, 2011

Press release for Who Shares? Who Doesn’t?

Filed under: Uncategorized — Heather Piwowar @ 11:54 am

My study on attributes associated with data sharing and withholding was published in PLoS ONE yesterday:

Piwowar, HA (2011). Who Shares? Who Doesn’t? Factors Associated with Openly Archiving Raw Research Data PLoS ONE, 6 (7) : 10.1371/journal.pone.0018657

The associated dataset is available in Dryad:

Piwowar HA (2011). Data from: Who shares? Who doesn’t? Factors associated with openly archiving raw research data Dryad Digital Repository 10.5061/dryad.mf1sd

The press release is on EurekAlert! and pasted below (quotes bolded).  A collection of links on patient consent for data archiving is included in a subsequent blog post.

Contact: Heather Piwowar
National Evolutionary Synthesis Center (NESCent)

Cancer data not readily available for future research

Cancer studies less likely than other research fields to make data available for reuse

Durham, NC — A new study finds that — even in a field with clear standards and online databases — the rate of public data archiving in cancer research is increasing only slowly. Furthermore, research studies in cancer and human subjects are less likely than other research studies to make their datasets available for reuse.

The results come from a study of patterns of research data availability conducted by Dr Heather Piwowar of the National Evolutionary Synthesis Center.

Data collected in scientific research is often useful for future studies by other investigators, but scientists have rarely made their raw research data widely available. Tools and initiatives are underway to encourage scientists to publicly archive their data. This analysis confirms there is still much room for improvement.

By querying the full text of the scientific literature through websites like Google Scholar and PubMed Central, Piwowar identified eleven thousand studies that collected a particular type of data about cellular activity, called gene expression microarray data. Only 45% of recent gene expression studies were found to have deposited their data in the public databases developed for this purpose. The rate of data publication has increased only slightly from 2007 to 2009. Data is shared least often from studies on cancer and human subjects: cancer studies make their data available for wide reuse half as often as similar studies outside cancer.

“It was disheartening to discover that studies on cancer and human subjects were least likely to make their data available. These data are surely some of the most valuable for reuse, to confirm, refute, inform and advance bench-to-bedside translational research,” Piwowar said.

“We want as much scientific progress as we can get from our tax and charity dollars. This requires increased access to data resources. Data can be shared while maintaining patient privacy,” Piwowar added, noting that patient re-identification is rarely an issue for gene expression microarray studies.

Most likely to share their data in public databases were investigators from Stanford University and those who published in the journal Physiological Genomics.

Scientist sometimes email each other to request datasets that aren’t available online, but these requests often go unanswered or are denied by the original investigators. Publishing data in online data repositories is considered the best way to share data for future reuse.

Recent policies by the NSF seek to increase the amount of data disseminated from federally-funded research by requiring data management and dissemination plans in all new grant applications.


The findings were published July 13th in the open access journal PLoS ONE.

CITATION: Piwowar, H.A. (2011). “Who shares? Who doesn’t? Factors associated with openly archiving raw research data.” PLoS ONE 6(7): e18657. doi:18610.11371/journal.pone.0018657

In the spirit of the topic, the raw data behind this study are publicly available in the Dryad Digital Repository at

The National Evolutionary Synthesis Center (NESCent) is a nonprofit science center dedicated to cross-disciplinary research in evolution. Funded by the National Science Foundation, NESCent is jointly operated by Duke University, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and North Carolina State University. For more information about research and training opportunities at NESCent, visit

ETA:  link to related reading on patient consent


  1. […] a few days before my dad’s diagnosis, I published a study which found that cancer datasets are less likely to be widely available for further research than […]

    Pingback by Cancer data: it just got personal « Research Remix — August 10, 2011 @ 8:32 pm

  2. […] increased data availability, and evidence that researchers often don’t makedata available, including for example in cancer) are trying to figure out how best to move […]

    Pingback by thoughts on where journals are now, what to do next « Research Remix — December 3, 2011 @ 2:59 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Blog at

%d bloggers like this: