Research Remix

March 21, 2012

Our large-scale #altmetrics analysis manuscript is up on arXiv

Filed under: Uncategorized — Heather Piwowar @ 7:28 pm

Excited to share a link to the preprint manuscript of our large-scale altmetrics analysis:

Altmetrics in the wild: Using social media to explore scholarly impact
Jason Priem, Heather A. Piwowar, Bradley M. Hemminger
http://arxiv.org/abs/1203.4745v1

We’ve submitted it for publication to PLoS ONE.

In addition to a stellar background section (all thanks to Jason), the paper has a whole lot of content: correlations! normalization! factor analysis! clustering! heatmaps!  20k+ articles!

Go check it out, and if you have any comments we’d love to hear them.

 

3 Comments

  1. Hi Heather,

    love the paper, and it looks like you all put a lot of work into it. One comment I can add from my geographical perspective is that most of the social media-based metrics you’ve followed are from platforms blocked in China. It will only have a small and probably not systematic effect on the papers you follow, but as China is supposed to be the second biggest country in terms of publication output now (and is growing rapidly) it would be interesting to see how 1.3 billion people only able to swap research via Sina-Weibo skews things, especially for papers from mainland Chinese authors or on subjects such as TCM. Its probably out of the scope of this paper, and tricky as PLoS doesn’t track this data and I’m not sure how open Sina would be about sharing it (I’m not sure how they view people drawing attention to the great firewall), but looking at the regional and cultural differences of altmetrics could be something interesting to look into in the future.

    Looking forward to reading the finished product shortly (I’m sure the peer-review will go very smoothly)!

    Scott

    Comment by Scott Edmunds — March 24, 2012 @ 10:48 pm

  2. Great point, Scott, thanks! We’ll (I’m one of Heather’s co-authors) plan to includes a sentence or two about this issue in the discussion section revisions. Of course geographical bias is a longstanding problem with citation databases as well…we might cite some of that literature, too. I love the idea of future work trying to look at Sina, as well as perhaps other national or language-based networks.

    Comment by Jason Priem (@jasonpriem) — March 25, 2012 @ 10:23 am

  3. No problem. Hope its useful, and agree there are so many fascinating stories to investigate in the future (do Brazilian’s swap research with Orkut, do Iranian’s really do everything using Google Reader?, etc.). The potential amounts of data you can mine is obviously growing exponentially, so good luck with it!

    Comment by Scott Edmunds — March 25, 2012 @ 9:04 pm


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: